Tengiz Zorikov

Academic Doctor of Science

Vladimer Chavchanidze Institute of Cybernetics of the Georgian Technical University

Scan QR

Separation of MiPS/MaPS spectrogram transformations in biosonarUday Sriram, James A, Simmons, Tengiz V.ZorikovarticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141, 3486 (2017);2.001 Online ISSN: 0001-4966 DOI:10.1121/1.4987269EnglishState Targeted Program
Echo-processing mechanisms in bottlenose dolphinsT.ZorikovarticlearXiv:1312.7774 [q-bio.NC] 2013 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.7774EnglishState Targeted Program
Bats Use Echo Harmonic Structure to Distinguish Their Targets from Background Clutter MARY E. BATES JAMES A. SIMMONS AND TENGIZ V. ZORIKOVarticleScience,2011, Vol 333, Issue 6042 pp.627-630 51.433 DOI: 10.1126/science.1202065EnglishGrant Project
Harmonic beamforming: Categorical perception segregates targets from clutter in bat sonar.JAMES A. SIMMONS , MARY E. BATES AND TENGIZ V. ZORIKOVarticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 2470 (2011).2.001 Online ISSN: 0001-4966 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3588122EnglishGrant Project
A computational model of the bottlenose dolphin sonar: Feature-extracting method.T.ZorikovarticleT Zorikov - arXiv preprint arXiv:0911.3125, 2009 - arxiv.org https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0911.3125EnglishState Targeted Program
A computational model of the bottlenose dolphin sonar: Feature-extracting method.T.ZorikovarticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, 3317 (2006)2.001 Online ISSN: 0001-4966 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4786334EnglishState Targeted Program
A model of echo-processing in bottlenose dolphinsZorikov T.V., Moore P.V., Bekauri N.J.conference proceedingsProceedings of the Symposium on Bio-Sonar Systems and Bio-Acoustics, Vol.26, Pt.6, Loughborough, UK, pp. 73-81 EnglishState Targeted Program
Science and technology gapsBob Allen, Les Atlas, John Fay, Matt Geen, Jeff Haun, Gordon Hayward, Ivor Kirsteins and Tengiz ZorikovmonographScience, Technical Innovation and Applications in Bioacoustics: Editor: John G Rees pp.14-20 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT CR/04/201 https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA460812.pdfEnglishState Targeted Program
Bio-mimetic sonar: results achieved and the road to improvementT.Zorikov, N.BekaurimonographScience, Technical Innovation and Applications in Bioacoustics: Editor: John G Rees pp.421-430 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT CR/04/201 https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA460812.pdfEnglishState Targeted Program
Echo-Processing Procedure in Bottlenose Dolphins.Tengiz V. Zorikov, N.A.Dubrovskyconference proceedingsOCEANS 2003. Proceedings Volume: 1 Print ISBN:0-933957-30-0 INSPEC Accession Number: 7986107 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4066091_Echo-processing_procedure_in_bottlenose_dolphinsEnglishState Targeted Program
Choice Reaction Time Under Different Attitudes of IndividualsM.Tsiskaridze, T.ZorikovarticleGeorgian Academy of Sciences Proceedings of the Institute of Cybernetics, vol.2, N 1-2, 2002, pp.147-152 ISSN 1512-1372 EnglishState Targeted Program
Asymmetry in perception of color and formT.Zorikov, M.Tsiskaridze, L.Pirvelashvili articleGeorgian Academy of Sciences Proceedings of the Institute of Cybernetics, vol.2, N 1-2, 2002, pp.153-160 ISSN 1512-1372 EnglishState Targeted Program
Signal processing by the Bottlenose dolphin’s sonar: experiments and modelingconference proceedings2nd Symposium on underwater bio-sonar and bioacoustics systems, Vol.23, Pt.4, Loughborough, England, pp. 65-74. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1282448EnglishGrant Project
Automatic detection of small underwater objects in near echolocation tasksT.Zorikov, M.Kuratashvili conference proceedingsGeorgian Academy of Sciences. Scientific-practical conference EnglishGrant Project

151st Annual Meeting of the Acoustical Society of AmericaProvidence,Rhode Island, USA20065-9 juneAcoustical Society of AmericaA computational model of bottlenose dolphin sonar: Feature-extracting methodoral

A process of echo-image formation in bottlenose dolphin’s perception was investigated in our experiments, in which animals were trained to differentiate passive actual echoes recorded beforehand purposely, as well as echo-like simulated impulses. The results suggest that dolphin, processing echoes within Critical Interval of Time (~0.2 ms), utilizes the string of three independent, hierarchically organized features (echoes’ subjective characteristics) being defined by different scales of spectral density oscillation, and energy. Herewith, dolphin is capable to assess feature’s average value over a series of echoes. Distinguishing stimuli, dolphin estimates successively features’ values from senior to minor, terminating the process at the feature, which contains detectable differences in compared stimuli (the distinctive feature). A procedure of subsequent identification of the reference stimulus can be described by the following decision rule: If the dolphin utilizes some feature as the distinctive one, then in order to preserve the image of the reference stimulus in the animal’s perception, it is necessary and sufficient to preserve the same values of the distinctive feature and all higher ones in order of hierarchy. These data were formalized mathematically and used in our computational model, comparative testing of which has revealed critical capabilities comparable with those of bottlenose dolphins. 

https://acoustics.org/pressroom/httpdocs/151st/press_luncheon.html
Symposium on Bio-Sonar Systems and Bio-AcousticsLoughborough, UK 2004 American acoustics societyA model of echo-processing in bottlenose dolphinsoral

Echolocating bottlenose dolphins can detect, discriminate and recognize, with remarkable accuracy, small-size submerged objects slightly differing from each other. Animals, interrogating their environment, utilize echolocation pulses, which, having been examined chaotically, are rather different in structure and duration. However, on-axis emitted clicks, which provide maximally informative echoes, are almost standard once the animal has had experience with the echolocation task. These clicks are usually one and a half period pulses approximately 8–12 ms in duration, with peak frequency of about 80–120 kHz [1–2]. Dolphins identify targets by acute processing of back-scattering echoes of complex multi-highlight structure that contain information about physical characteristics of targets. The sonar system of dolphins is promising for modeling technical analogues, and is the main reason of scientific researches, have studied these animals for more than 40 years in a number of technically advanced countries. The main objective of our studies of the sonar system of dolphins was accumulation of data necessary for the creation of bio-mimetic devices with matching performance. (The aspects of echo discrimination and recognition, but not of echo detection). Accordingly, our attention was focused on echo-processing procedures taking place in the animal’s brain. A set of logically interrelated tests (15 in total) were developed and conducted on the bottlenose dolphins for that purpose, and a computational model was developed based on the gained results [3–7]. Creating the model, we utilized a simple mathematical interpretation of these results, just to check out comparative effectiveness of the feature extracting method revealed in our experiments, in echo-discrimination tasks. We used echo-like signals simulated in a computer and echoes reflected from actual targets to compare effectiveness of the model and dolphin performances. Temporal characteristics of simulated echoes were randomized and white noise was added to complicate discrimination tasks and make them closer to the actual conditions. The real echoes, used in these measurements, were recorded during a matching-to-sample task performed by dolphin

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259483415_Echo-processing_mechanisms_in_bottlenose_dolphins
A Workshop on Science, Technical Innovation and Applications in BioacousticsNorth Berwick, Scotland2004 NATOBio-mimetic sonar: results achieved and the road to improvementoral

The main objective of our studies of the sonar system of dolphins was accumulation of data necessary to creation of bio-mimetic devices with matching performance. A set of special tests was developed and conducted on the bottlenose dolphins for that purpose, and computational model was embodied on the gained data. This study used synthetic two-highlight echoes with randomized parameters mixed with white noise to compare effectiveness of the model and dolphin performances. The measurements reveal advantage of the model over the bottlenose dolphin’s sonar on signals used. The further steps to the probable improvement of the model are discussed.eps to the probable improvement of the model are discussed.

OCEANS ConferenceSan Diego CA, USA200312-14 ნოემბერიAmerican acoustics societyEcho-Processing Procedure in Bottlenose Dolphinsoral

For investigation of the echo-processing mechanisms in dolphins a set of logically interrelated tests is developed. In these experiments animals are trained to differentiate simulated echo-like signals and echoes from actual targets. Application of this set of tests to the Black Sea bottlenose dolphins revealed that signal components highlighted within a time interval /spl sim/0.2 ms are shown to produce a merged auditory image in dolphins' perception. By analysis of echo within this time window, dolphins utilize three independent discriminative features being determined by the different scale of spectral density oscillations of the echo and by its energy. The animals do not assess differences in signals' polarity. The invariant hierarchical relations between these features were found out, and the structure of the hierarchy was established. The ability of animals to evaluate an average value of the dominant feature in a series of echoes was demonstrated as well. The decision rule describing the process of echoes identification by the dolphins is stated.

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA460812.pdf
2nd Symposium on underwater bio-sonar and bioacoustics systemsLoughborough, UK2001 American acoustics societyAutomatic detection of small underwater objects in near echolocation tasksoral


Web of Science: ციტირების ინდექსი-89, H ინდექსი-2
Scopus: ციტირების ინდექსი-82, H ინდექსი-2
Google Scholar: ციტირების ინდექსი-162, H ინდექსი-5

Doctoral Thesis Referee


Master Theses Supervisor


Doctoral Thesis Supervisor/Co-supervisor


Scientific editor of monographs in foreign languages


Scientific editor of a monograph in Georgian


Editor-in-Chief of a peer-reviewed or professional journal / proceedings


Review of a scientific professional journal / proceedings


Member of the editorial board of a peer-reviewed scientific or professional journal / proceedings


Participation in a project / grant funded by an international organization


Hierarchical Echo Signal-Processing For Biosonar Classification NICOP Project N07-09Office of Naval Research, 875 North Randolph Street, Suite 1425, Code 321US, Arlington, VA 22203-1995 აშშ 01/07/2007-01/07/2010PI

Participation in a project / grant funded from the state budget


Patent authorship


Membership of the Georgian National Academy of Science or Georgian Academy of Agricultural Sciences


Membership of an international professional organization


Membership of the Conference Organizing / Program Committee


National Award / Sectoral Award, Order, Medal, etc.


Honorary title


Monograph


Handbook


Research articles in high impact factor and local Scientific Journals


A computational model of bottlenose dolphin sonar: Feature-extracting method. 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2217.State Target Program

A process of echo‐image formation in bottlenose dolphin perception was investigated in our experiments, in which animals were trained to differentiate passive actual echoes recorded beforehand purposely, as well as echo‐like simulated impulses. The results suggest that dolphin, processing echoes within critical interval of time (∼0.2 ms), utilizes the string of three independent, hierarchically organized features (echoes subjective characteristics) being defined by different scales of spectral density oscillation, and energy. Herewith, dolphin is capable to assess features average value over a series of echoes. Distinguishing stimuli, dolphin estimates successively features values from senior to minor, terminating the process at the feature, which contains detectable differences in compared stimuli (the distinctive feature). A procedure of subsequent identification of the reference stimulus can be described by the following decision rule: If the dolphin utilizes some feature as the distinctive one, then in order to preserve the image of the reference stimulus in the animal’s perception, it is necessary and sufficient to preserve the same values of the distinctive feature and all higher ones in order of hierarchy. These data were formalized mathematically and used in our computational model, comparative testing of which has revealed critical capabilities comparable with those of bottlenose dolphins.

https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4786334
Harmonic beamforming: Categorical perception segregates targets from clutter in bat sonar. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011 vol. 129, issue 4, p. 2470State Target Program

Beaming for FMbiosonar transmissions of big brown bats is broad and frequency‐dependent (70 deg at 25 kHz to 30 deg at 80 kHz). In flight, sound reception is directional and frequency‐dependent, too, being oriented to the front and centered on‐axis. A broadcast beam defined by the harmonic ratio of FM2 to FM1 depicts the frontal zone for flat‐spectrum ensonification surrounded by increasingly lowpass ensonification for objects located off to the sides and farther away. The width and flat front of the central lobe of this harmonic‐ratio beam predict the bat’s acoustic behavior during flights in obstacle arrays of different densities [Petrites et al., JCP‐A (2009)] and the spatial unmasking of target detection by relocating clutter to progressively larger horizontal separations from the target [Sumer et al., JCP‐A (2009)]. Amplitude‐latency trading for responses to FM2 relative to FM1 in lowpass echoes causes echo‐delay acuity to defocus, which also prevents masking from clutter. Only focused delay images can mask other focused images, which effectively excludes clutter echoes from causing masking. [Work supported by the ONR and the NIMH.]

https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.3588122
Bats Use Echo Harmonic Structure to Distinguish Their Targets from Background Clutter, ul.2011.Science,333:29State Target Program

When echolocating big brown bats fly in complex surroundings, echoes arriving from irrelevant objects (clutter) located to the sides of their sonar beam can mask perception of relevant objects located to the front (targets), causing "blind spots." Because the second harmonic is beamed more weakly to the sides than the first harmonic, these clutter echoes have a weaker second harmonic. In psychophysical experiments, we found that electronically misaligning first and second harmonics in echoes (to mimic the misalignment of corresponding neural responses to harmonics in clutter echoes) disrupts the bat's echo-delay perception but also prevents clutter masking. Electronically offsetting harmonics to realign their neural responses restores delay perception but also clutter interference. Thus, bats exploit harmonics to distinguish clutter echoes from target echoes, sacrificing delay acuity to suppress masking.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21798949/

Publication in Scientific Conference Proceedings Indexed in Web of Science and Scopus